Employers and human resource professionals will undoubtedly remember 2022 as another year shaped by the pandemic.
But…there were also legal developments in 2022 that were not related to COVID-19. In this FTR Now, we look at some of the past year’s notable “non-pandemic” cases and legislative developments.
In Henderson v. Slavkin et al., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that a termination clause in an employment contract which limited entitlements upon termination to only the minimums required by the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) was unenforceable due to the wording of the provisions related to “confidential information” and “conflict of interest.”…
In Humphrey v. Mene Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal found that a dismissed employee failed in her duty to mitigate by rejecting a comparable job offer with a new employer seven months following her termination of employment. The former employee, who had been the employer’s Chief Operating Officer, was 32 years old when her…
Hicks Morley’s Thomas Agnew authored an article in Benefits Canada titled “Constructive Dismissal and the Corresponding Duty to Mitigate Damages.” In a recent case, the Ontario Superior Court found an employee failed to mitigate damages when he refused a return-to-work offer from his employer, with whom he had a good working relationship. This case serves as an important…
In Dussault v Imperial Oil Limited, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that two employees did not fail to mitigate their damages when they refused offers of employment from the purchaser of a former employer, as the employment that was offered was not “comparable.” Background In 2016, Imperial Oil sold its retail business to Mac’s…
In a recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Chevalier v. Active Tire & Auto Centre Inc., the Court upheld a trial judge’s finding that an employee who refused an offer of re-employment with his former employer was not entitled to damages: there was no evidence that had he returned to that workplace,…
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has upheld a lower court decision which found the plaintiff (Mr. Chevalier), who had been constructively dismissed, was not entitled to damages after he declined an offer of re-employment from his former employer. It held that the trial judge had properly considered and applied the legal principles, concluding on…
PRACTICE PROFILE Class actions with an HR twist LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS Mitigation of damages: Strategic considerations for employers Changing a term of employment? Notice may not be enough PROFILE A Pension Benefit Download PDF
